This article contextualizes, and contests, the use of the terms mental health (MH) and well-being in ideologically driven educational policies and practices, market oriented, individualistic and measurable. Alongside an unprecedented worldwide trend to establish an educational ‘turn’, so called ‘therapeutic education’, it is argued that educational policies in the UK have arbitrarily merged, or ‘yoked’, the terms MH and well-being with ethical implication for policy implementation.

Through ethnographic and participative methodologies, involving the main social actors to mobilize expert knowledge in two educational settings, the ‘yoking’ of MH with well-being becomes apparent and catalyst for further yoking. Hence, more policies and new concepts emerge as manipulations of school/colleges’ initiatives, such as achieving good results or promoting ‘character’ to engineer next generation citizenry. Juxtaposing the terms MH and well-being to education calls for clearer re-definitions of the aims of education.

Every effort should be made by policy makers to keep the two terms independent from each other and well-articulated with performance indicators such as resilience that do not undermine the value of vulnerability. New definitions of MH and well-being should guide policy making and implementation in schools/colleges, to avoid lumping up together heterogeneous and multilayered terms that deserve distinct attention and application.